Requirements for maternity?

Published on May 4 2006

CNN.com - Woman, 63, 'delighted' by pregnancy - May 4, 2006 In speaking about this case, where the mom-to-be is 62 years old, the good doctor had this to say:
He said Rashbrook, whom he last saw in November, was "perfect" for the treatment, because although she was 62 at the time, she had a biological age of about 45. "She came here with her husband, the couple love each other, she is very slim, blonde and in perfect condition, she fits all the criteria for maternity."
Um...slim? Blonde? This is sounding more like a Britney Spears lookalike audition than anything else. And as far as that "biological age" thing--I am 45, and I cannot even conceive (heh) of wanting to get PG again. I'm looking forward to GRANDCHILDREN--you know, the ones you fill full of sugary soda and candy and just generally spoil rotten--and then send home to their parents? candy UPDATE: No, I do not want to be a grandma anytime in the near future. Thank you.

Written by admin

Published on #children, #Pics and Babbling

Repost0
To be informed of the latest articles, subscribe:
You might also like:
California People
California People
To Have and to Hold.........
To Have and to Hold.........
As a papermaker.....
As a papermaker.....
Mom-isms
Mom-isms
Comment on this post
S
Shawn
10/10/2012 03:33
We could do that, too. I LOVE El Mezcal. Probably my favorite place to eat, heh heh
Reply
M
mad
10/10/2012 03:33
Had ya worried there for a sec, didn't i??<br /> <br /> sugary soda and candy? I thought you wanted sushi for graduation dinner?<br /> That Mexican place you recommended was <i>excellent</i>, too.
Reply
S
Shawn
10/10/2012 03:33
"UPDATE: No, I do not want to be a grandma anytime in the near future. Thank you."<br /> <br /> *sighs in relief* Plus, I'm the one you need to be filling with sugary soda and candy.
Reply